Microsoft permits the use of these icons in architectural diagrams, training materials, or documentation.
Admin iconset download#
The download file name has been updated to Azure_Public_Service_Icons_V4.zip Icon terms There are ~26 icons that have been added to the existing set. If you encounter any issues, let us know. The files in the icons folder are the same except there is no longer a CXP folder.
Admin iconset pdf#
The FAQs and Terms of Use PDF files appear in the first level when you download the SVG icons below. The folder structure of our collection of Azure architecture icons has changed. Don't use Microsoft product icons to represent your product or service.īrowse all Azure architectures to view other examples.Don't distort or change icon shape in any way.Use the icons as they would appear within Azure.In diagrams, we recommend to include the product name somewhere close to the icon.Use the icon to illustrate how products can work together.On this page you will find an official collection of Azure architecture icons including Azure product icons to help you build a custom architecture diagram for your next solution. Architecture diagrams like those included in our guidance can help communicate design decisions and the relationships between components of a given workload. So, if you ask for but not, than the latter will not show up in the consent prompt and will not be included in the token.Helping our customers design and architect new solutions is core to the Azure Architecture Center's mission. But in your case, is for Graph API, so the other possibility is that you're specifying the scopes you want instead of using /.default, and in that case you will only receive the ones you request. So, for this example, if the permission is not for Graph API, you would not receive it in the token.
Admin iconset registration#
Example from Microsoft's documentation: "By specifying the scope in its request, your application is requesting an access token that includes scopes for every Microsoft Graph permission you've selected for the app in the app registration portal." If you request the /.default scope together with prompt=consent, the user will be asked to grant access to every permission configured on the application (both delegated and application types) for the resource that comes before /.default. The admin consent endpoint grants permission to all permissions configured for that application (both delegated and application type). They will not be prompted to allow the app permissions since the admin already did that for the entire tenant (unless you use prompt=consent). You provide the link for the admin consent endpoint to the users, they give it to their admin, and after that, they can do the normal authorization flow by logging in with their Microsoft account. I see this as a way for non-admin users to request their admins to allow them to use the application. I figured out that there are multiple ways, an admin can consent permissions requested by an app: Option 1: With the authorization endpoint and a parameter 'promptconsent' like this: However, there is also a dedicated admin consent endpoint you can use if you would like to. This one is old, but here's my 2 cents anyway. Using admin consent endpoint vs authorize endpoint with promtconsent. This does not look like a straightforward implementation to me. Another application permission "" was not included in the token. (For example I added the application permission "" what was returned in the token. But if I access this endpoint with promt=consent parameter as an admin, why does this endpoint also returns a token with some of the application (not delegated) permissions? Is the admin consent endpoint independent of v1 or v2 endpoints?īut most important: I use the authorize endpoint only to get tokens on behalf of users. If I only want to request admin consent without getting any access token, I will use the admin consent endpoint, right?
So the adminconsent endpoint seems to be version agnostic. This works as expected and I get also the admin consent, but no token.Īlso it seems that here is no difference between endpoint v1 and endpoint v2. With the authorization endpoint and a parameter "prompt=consent" like this: &redirect_uri= I figured out that there are multiple ways, an admin can consent permissions requested by an app: